If a providential government were to break down under a contract style of colonialism the interested international parties would need have no qualms about pulling out whenever it be deemed worthwhile.
If there was an understanding that the international investing community was not going to police their client states, the investors could act to protect their own interests with impunity; while of course staying within the customs & rules of the International Community.
The interest in a client state would be twofold. One, to bring prosperity to the world (as best as possible), and two, to ensure enough peace and prosperity in the World to ensure a homeland safe from mass immigration.
The interests of a sovereign in a client state could find its form many ways. Minerals, textiles, fruits, hand stitchings, furnishings…..
The advantage to the people and governing class of the client state would be gigantic. Individuals and families would be introduced to the possibility of having a say in the destiny of their people at a grand scale.
By providing detailed blueprints and actionable infrastructure for people in their home countries, we create work opportunities, we create livelihoods, and we edify people that rise up the rank.
We return the favor by introducing our new friends to products of the first world. Devices, modern homes, vehicles, better produce, industrial buildings selling hygienic products and groceries, etc.
The relationship then burgians from there. Expanding an export/import base, finding an output balance, forming a capital city.
Ideally a capital city will be in the most convenient place for economic trade routes while of course hopefully being a place adequately lovely.
The considerations of this type of colonialism demand the consideration of epochs. We must be able to think past election cycles. We must think about some things we don’t want to think about. We may have to think about civil strife and we may have to think about the potential of future civil strife. We must be human but we must also be smart. We ought aim to edify peoples and places best we can knowing all the while things may turn bad. This is why the type of intercession we ought perform is one that does demand any kind of moral equalization on the part of client countries. We raise up who is most loved, who is most bright, most trustworthy, and we hope for their great success. We do not expect to always find success.
I say the embassy be made into something more of a block; of a square. A place that defines itself amongst the people, yet is split apart, yet is more than a mere building and courtyard. Here should be a store, a restaurant or two, a commercial building, and a park which can be a point of connection between the capital block and the broader community. With a gate on the outer perimeter of the park which collects weapons and items from those coming in, we can ensure safety throughout the area.
Of course within the capital block there would be more privacy and off limits areas. We could even make a list of people allowed within the zone. Maybe let people in randomly every so often to try some of the first world goodies.
It’s not inconceivable to imagine there could be an imperial presence outside of some kind of capital block that serves as a mini city for the paternal country. First world stores designed for the servicing of people from the developing world. Definitely possible.
Choosing a client within a country would be a thing of chance at times and obvious at others. There is indeed nothing stopping an international partner from pulling out a place the instant unrest begins and then from returning at a later point to negotiate with the party in power at said later point in time.
This concept hinges first on the overcoming of our current 2024 wave of mass immigration. Remigration seems a good option at the moment. Remigration does not mean the problem is solved, though. Remigration must be followed up with a better, more thorough docket of considerations. One such is the building of an adequate wall. Another is the building of better relationships. America is a place where great things are built. We should never stop building great things and never stop employing our people to be great. We should find ways to multiple more by the invitation of the people of the world to be part of the creation of greatness, and for them to have the oppurtunity to share in the good things that have come from the first world.
America must lead on this.
As far as an ethics understanding, the interest of the international community in a country would be to offer our knowledge of and ability to apply the principles of international capitalism. We would not be there to play politics. Choosing a leader is one thing, saying this is our guy is another. On top of this, the emphasis should be on building economic alliances. The capital block would be the property of the interested country.
All assets would have to be listed in some sort of freeport status. We manage but at any time could a recognized local interest procour. With our departure however departs the sphere of influence of the US and the access to our markets. And also our engineering knack.
Contracts would be all about the products. If they are made and moved, people get paid and everyone is happy.
J.W. 